Note
This proposal is an introduction to an incentive program to build a strong DeFi ecosystem on Project Dragon (tentative name). We intend to utilize this proposal to receive feedback from the Project Dragon community and ecosystem members on the need for an incentive program, its framework, and its process and timeline, all of which will be decided upon after discussion and input. We look forward to hearing from community members and DeFi builders.
Our DeFi Endgame
Current Landscape
The liquidity mining (LM)-centric blockchain ecosystem that began with the DeFi Summer of 2020 saw TVL surge from $1B to $170B by the end of 2021, but from mid-2022, the bubble burst due to over-leveraging, and the deleveraging process brought down the existing ecosystem that relied on LM.
During this period, some DApps failed to create synergy between services despite adopting LM, while others survived by improving their business model (BM). Post-bubble, DApps could be categorized into three broad groups:
- (A): DApps that introduced LM but failed to create synergy with other services and collapsed
- (B): DApps that adopted LM and synergized with other services and survived.
- (C): DApps that did not rely on the LM structure, but improved their BM and increased their value as a real financial product.
In the Klaytn DeFi ecosystem, LM-based DApps grew during the DeFi Summer, but the growth of DApps was hindered by closed operating policies. As a result, the growth of the ecosystem as a whole was stagnant, resulting in an ecosystem centered on (A), which collapsed in 2022 with a sharp drop in TVL during the on-chain bubble burst and deleveraging process.
As-Is: An ecosystem centered around (A)
Dragon Chain Landscape
In order for DeFi ecosystems like Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Optimism to be firmly established, it is necessary to improve asset accessibility, create an environment for new DApp growth, currency multiplier effect, and safe movement of external funds, and such an ecosystem is centered on DApps of types (B) and (C).
D2I is the first project that aims to lay the foundation for the creation of Dragon Chainโs DeFi ecosystem, and will prioritize the discovery of DApps that are characterized as public infrastructure, such as DEX and Lending Protocol, among other core infrastructures. However, Dapps that adopt innovative structures such as Onchain Orderbook, Hybrid DEX (Orderbook + AMM), and existing ecosystem participants that meet all the requirements of D2I will also be included in D2I.
To-Be: An ecosystem centered on (B) and (C)
In addition, Dragon Chain anticipates that each layer will eventually include the following DApps to create an ecosystem with diversity, including but not limited to:
- DEX
- CLAMM (Concentrated Liquidity AMM) โ Current Priority
- Weighted Pools โ Current Priority
- Stableswaps โ Current Priority
- Onchain Orderbook
- Hybrid DEX (Orderbook + AMM)
- Lending
- Legacy Lending (e.g. Aave, Compound) โ Current Priority
- Risk-Isolated Lending (e.g. Silo Finance) โ Current Priority
- Asset Layer
- Native Coin, Dapp Tokens, RWA tokens, LSTs, Stablecoins, bridged tokens
- Gov. Aggregator
- Gov. Efficiency Booster + Liquid Wrapper (e.g. Aura, Convex)
- Bribe Market (e.g. Votium, Hidden Hand)
- Derivatives
- Perp DEX (e.g. Hyperliquid, Vertex)
- Tick-based Options(e.g. Dopex v2, InfinityPools)
- Yield Aggregator
- Yield Compounding (e.g. Beefy)
- Onchain Asset Management (e.g. Gearbox, Yearn, Sommelier)
- LSDfi
- Yield-Stripping Derivatives (e.g. Pendle)
- CDP (e.g. Lybra, Raft)
- LSD ETF (e.g. unshETH)
- Swap Aggregator
- Onchain Aggregator (e.g. 1inch, Swapscanner)
- Intent-based Swaps (e.g. CoW Swap, Uniswap X)
- Bridge
- Legacy Bridge (e.g. Wormhole, Synapse)
- Restaking Bridge
Lead the Wave: Seize Dominance in an Emerging Ecosystem
Previously, the DeFi ecosystem has been plagued by various issues, for example, the recent depegging of bridged assets has led to abnormal on-chain pricing of KLAY and KCT, which in turn has led to liquidity borrowing (e.g. Lending, CDP, LYF) and toxic debt centered on several DApps. Moving forward, we intend to prioritize minimizing DeFi risks through various initiatives such as an insurance fund.
Meanwhile, both Klaytn and Finschia have many years of mainnet operation experience, as well as the capabilities of mature networks in terms of chain size, core team technical skills, and Web3 resources. Post-merge, we will also have the largest user base among Asia-based blockchains, giving our DeFi ecosystem explosive growth potential.
- Klaytn
- Accumulated Tx Volume : $376B
- Web3 Wallets Users : 29M+
- Community : 240k+
- KLAY Mcap : $673M+
- ATH Onchain TVL : $1B+
- Strong Presence : Korea, Singapore, and Vietnam
- Finschia
- Web 3 Wallet Users : 5.6M+
- Community : 170k+
- Finschia Mcap : $213M+
- Strong Presence : Japan, Taiwan, Thailand, and Abu Dhabi
In addition, the two networks have a potential user base of 250M+, powered by Kakao and Line. When the time comes for DeFi to be institutionalized, builders will be able to more easily offer DeFi services to a customer base that is less familiar with crypto.
The Foundation will actively utilize its resources to provide monetary and non-monetary support to builders on Project Dragon in order to lay the foundation for a robust DeFi ecosystem anchored by (B) and (C) type DApps, and builders. As partners in creating the ecosystem with the Foundation, these DApps will be expected to return a portion of the revenue generated from the activation of DeFi so that the success of their services can lead to value creation for the network.
Rationale: Why Weโre Starting From Scratch
The collapse of the DeFi ecosystem built around Liquidity Mining
The hype around Liquidity Mining (minting your own tokens to incentivize) and the projects that built Money Legos around it that sparked the DeFi Summer in June 2020 saw DeFiโs TVL explode from $1B to around $170B by the end of 2021.
However, as the bubble burst due to over-leveraging, deleveraging began in mid-2022, and the existing ecosystem, which was overly dependent on LM, collapsed.
During the deleveraging process, DApps that adopted LM but failed to synergize with other services collapsed (A), while DApps that adopted LM but adopted a structure that could synergize with other services took a hit but survived (B). At the same time, DApps that did not rely on the LM structure but improved their BM to enhance their value as real financial products gained attention (C). As a result, the DeFi ecosystem was reorganized around (B) and (C).
Klaytn DeFi Ecosystem Yesterday and Today
The Klaytn DeFi ecosystem also saw a rapid increase in TVL since DeFi Summer 2020, with DApps based on LM as the mainstay. The amount of capital flowing into the on-chain was higher than the amount flowing out, maintaining the price of the governance token, and various derivatives utilizing it were newly created. In addition, DApps with LM structures (CDP, Algorithmic Stablecoin, Lending, Gov. Aggregator) have also emerged, attracting a lot of funds to Klaytn and revitalizing the DeFi ecosystem.
However, the closed operating policies of some DApps has put a brake on growth. Since new DApps need to establish a certain level of track record before they can be listed on a spot exchange, they form liquidity pools on DEXs and maintain the price of their tokens based on those pools. In other words, the pools on the centralized DEXs act as oracles that determine the price of the DAppโs tokens.
For the above reasons, new DApps will make various efforts to form a liquidity pool on the DEX and keep the size of the pool large, and a common structure seen in various DeFi ecosystems so far is to collect the DEXโs governance token to influence the Incentive Gauge.
There are various ways to collect governance tokens, some of which are directly purchased, but most of them utilize a market where voting rights can be temporarily purchased, and a new DApp - Bribe Market - naturally appears here. In addition, Governance Aggregators that solve the inefficiency of the VE model also naturally appear, and Money Lego (hereinafter referred to as โLegoโ) is formed, which leads to DEX - Bribe Market - Gov. Aggregator. Based on this Lego, the scale of the DeFi ecosystem expands as new DApps build their own ecosystems with well-established strategies.
However, in Klaytn, new DApps were not able to enjoy this Lego effect, so the growth of the ecosystem stalled, and fewer and fewer builders joined the Klaytn network. In addition, as DApps failed to synergize with other services, they continued to experience a downward spiral in the deleveraging process, just like DApps in category (A).
As a result, an environment that is not suitable for creating DApps was created, and projects attempting to do things like (C) preferred other chains, and the ecosystem failed to move from (A) to (B).
Focal Points
Project Dragon will create an ecosystem centered on (B) and (C)
In order for an ecosystem centered on (B) and (C) to be created, four main conditions must be met:
- There must be a marketplace where assets can be easily bought and sold, making them more accessible.
- An environment must be created where new DApps can grow.
- A currency multiplier effect must be possible.
- Funds from large external chains can be safely moved to the Dragon Chain.
In order to become an ecosystem that meets the above four conditions, we will focus on the following two sectors:
-
DEX (CLAMM / Stableswap / Weighted Pools + VE model)
- Based on CLAMM and Stableswap, we will reduce price impact and improve on-chain swap conditions to create a place where assets can be easily bought and sold.
- Through a structure that allows DApps to use LP tokens in Weighted Pools for governance, DAppsโ tokens can reduce price volatility based on abundant on-chain liquidity and increase the utilization of PDT.
- Based on the open VEmodel, it creates an environment where new DApps can use various strategies to adjust the price of assets on-chain, and provides a place for them to grow until they are listed on the spot exchange.
- Derivatives based on CLAMM LP will be formed, paving the way for more sophisticated financial products to be launched.
-
Lending
- Create an environment where investors can safely borrow capital based on a risk-isolated structure, and create an environment where Dragon Token can be the backbone.
- Provide a liquidity borrowing window for CLAMM delta neutral farming and encourage the LST Looping strategy to be activated, naturally increasing the amount of PDT deposits.
- Lending-based tokens are highly versatile, paving the way for more advanced forms of financial instruments to be launched in the future.
Incentive Program Specifications
Overview
Funding categories
Financial resources are categorized as follows:
- Liquidity Provision
- This is to provide the minimum liquidity needed to launch the service.
- The liquidity is owned by the Foundation and is lent out interest-free to help Dapps take their first steps.
- DEX
- To support the initial liquidity required to form a KLAY-based liquidity pool.
- Each DEX can receive approximately $600k worth of KLAY.
- Lending
- Provides initial liquidity for the formation of KLAY-based vaults.
- You can receive $500k in KLAY per lending.
- This is to provide the minimum liquidity needed to launch the service.
- DEV Grant
- A grant to cover some of the costs of launching a service.
- DEX & Lending
- Separate security audit support if you use a security audit firm that has a working relationship with the Foundation.
- You can receive up to $50k in KLAY per team.
- Liquidity Incentive
- An incentive to increase TVL to reduce the burn rate of Dapps and support user acquisition costs (UAC).
- DEX & Lending
- The evaluation of the value contributed to the Klaytn network in relation to the incentives provided will be conducted from various perspectives, based on a pre-established framework with set benchmarks.
- The liquidity incentives do not necessarily have to be exhausted within a specified period. Instead, considering various factors, the foundation and team will derive an appropriate method (e.g., Vesting, Linear Distribution) and distribute the incentives in the most effective manner.
Investorsโ money flows when they see incentives, so itโs hard to expect an influx of new money with just a Liquidity Provision and DEV Grant that doesnโt affect the DAppโs incentive structure. Therefore, for the DeFi Incentive Program to be truly effective, there must be a separate Liquidity Incentive, and approval will be granted after careful scrutiny of whether the DApp has a strategy to effectively leverage the incentive program to attract and maintain TVL.
Program Design Framework
-
All DeFi TVLs
- Networks excluded from benchmarking
- We excluded networks like Optimism, Arbitrum, Avalanche, and Polygon because their market cap and TVL were too high to be a short-term goal.
- We excluded networks with high LST dominance, such as Ethereum and Solana, which have a different composition of the DeFi ecosystem than permissioned blockchains.
- Networks we benchmarked
- We used Base, Manta, Mantle, Sui, and Aptos, which have just started building their DeFi ecosystems, as our benchmarks, and targeted an overall DeFi TVL of $250M.
- Networks excluded from benchmarking
-
DEX & Lending TVL
- The average ratio of DEX and Lending TVL to total TVL for active chains is 31.54% and 33.95%, respectively, and the combined ratio is about 65%.
- Since Dragon Chain aims to prioritize DEX and lending, the proportion of TVL from DEX and lending is expected to be higher than this, and we have set a target of $200M, which is 80% of the total TVL.
-
MAW (Monthly Active Wallet)
- Active chains are seeing TVLs at the MAW* (800-1,000) level, while Klaytn currently has a MAW in the 500s.
- As it aims to revitalize the DeFi ecosystem, Dragon Chain has also set a target of MAW * $1,000, which is in line with other networks.
-
Volume / TVL (Annualized)
- The active chains have maintained a 30-day swap volume (Volume/TVL(30d)) of 10 or more relative to the DEX TVL, while Klaytn has fallen short, hovering around 5.
- For Project Dragon, we have set a goal of reaching a Volume/TVL (Annualized) of 120 based on the activation of the DeFi ecosystem.
-
Trading Volume (Annualized)
- The value is derived from DEX TVL * Volume/TVL (Annualized), and we targeted $15B in annualized trading volume on the DEX.
-
KLAY Value Accr. (DEX)
-
KLAY Value Accr. (Lending)
Timeline
The Liquidity Provision and DEV Grant will be bundled together to manage milestones, and projects that diligently fulfill their milestones after the service launch will be eligible to receive Liquidity Incentives.
-
Post Draft Proposal: Call for Proposals
- Jan 22, 2024
-
Request for Comment : Listening to Klaytn Builder/Community Feedback (2w)
- Jan 22, 2024 ~ Feb 5, 2024
-
Post Proposal and prepare for voting on Klaytn Square
- Jan 25, 2024 ~ Jan 29, 2024
-
Vote on Klaytn Square
- Jan 29, 2024 ~ Feb 5, 2024
-
Post Final Proposal : Finalized proposal based on feedback
- Feb 6, 2024
-
Call for Proposal : Period to receive builder proposals
- Feb 6, 2024 ~ Feb 20, 2024
-
Review CFP : Builder proposals are reviewed and projects are selected for Liquidity Provision & Dev Fund support
- Feb 20, 2024 ~ Feb 27, 2024
-
Deploy Product Beta Version : Beta version released
- Apr 30, 2024
-
Liquidity Provision for Eligible Builders : Liquidity Provision support for projects that are on track to meet their milestones
- May 1, 2024 ~ May 15, 2024
-
Liquidity Incentive for Eligible Builders : Liquidity Incentive support for projects that are on track to meet their milestones.
- Jul 1, 2024 ~ Oct 1, 2024
- We anticipate an influx of Liquidity Manager, Gov Aggregator, Bribe Market, and Yield Aggregator builders during this time.
-
Analyze the impact of the program : Analyze the impact of the program and share results with the community
- Oct 1, 2024 ~ Nov 8, 2024
Requirements
Liq. Provision & DEV Grant Requirement (All)
- Based on the simulation data, it should be explained that Klaytn has an environment where more transactions can occur due to lower Tx fees compared to other networks, and that the success of the service can lead to the value creation of the network by returning part of the revenue generated from the activation of DeFi to KLAY.
- The main items for KLAY value creation are Insurance Fund, Revenue Wallet, Burn Fund, and Weighted Pools, and please refer to the Appendix for details.
- Include not only the amount of KLAY being utilized in the Dapp (Deposit, Stake, Trade (Spot, Margin, etc. etc.)) but also the use cases of KLAY in the linked ecosystem.
- Explain how you will provide an environment for new DApps to grow.
- DEX โ Launchpad, IFO(Initial Farm Offering) etc. etc.
- Lending Market โ Create an environment where low-mcap assets can also form a vault.
- All code must be open-sourced and have at least one audit.
- Contracts must be validated on a block explorer
- Milestones and KPIs to evaluate the performance of each milestone must be set, and each milestone must include metrics to indicate quantitative performance as well as development progress.
- Milestones must specify clear metrics to measure performance, including statements about KLAY value creation.
- DApps must go through the listing process in DeFiLlama, Dappradar, and the new governance portal.
- The project must be operational for at least one year after the grant is awarded, unless there are valid reasons. If not, the grant must be returned.
- Dapps must go through KYC process to receive incentives
Liq. Provision & DEV Grant Requirement (New DEX)
- Liq. Provision & DEV Grant Requirement (New DEX)
- AMM must follow at least one of the following structures: CLAMM, Stableswap, and Weighted Pool.
- CLAMM (e.g. Trader Joeโs bin-based AMM, Uniswap v3 AMM
- Stableswap (e.g. Curve, Wombat))
- Weighted Pool (e.g. Balancer)
- Adopt the structure of an open VE model and explain how it will create an environment where DApps can build Money Lego.
Liq. Provision & Dev Grant Requirements (New Lending)
- If adopting the structure of Legacy Lending, be able to demonstrate how it is differentiated from existing marketplace lending.
- Share the risk framework you will use when listing new assets and explain the rationale for setting vault-specific parameters.
- Demonstrate that the clearing structure as designed is secure
- The sensitivity of the clearing structure (are you looking at both on- and off-chain prices, and if so, at what frequency and from where are you calling the data, are you removing outlier values, etc.)
- Adopt an open clearing structure so that ordinary participants can participate in bidding
Liq. Provision & DEV Grant Requirement (Current Builders)
- Dapps that adopt innovative structures such as Onchain Orderbook, Hybrid DEX (Orderbook + AMM), etc. are all eligible for the incentive program.
- In addition to DEX and Lending, any competitive product can participate in the incentive program.
- For AMM DEXs, the following conditions must be met:
- Transition to an open VE model and explain how it will create an environment where DApps can build Money Lego.
- The AMM must be a Concentrated Liquidity structure.
Liquidity Incentive Requirements (All) โ Includes both current and new builders
- Liq. Provision and DEV Grant Requirements and consistently achieve the stated milestones.
- The value contributed to the Klaytn network compared to the incentive paid will be evaluated from various aspects, and incentive payments may be suspended if the threshold is not met.
- DApps are prohibited from farming incentives themselves
- DApps must publish a dashboard that provides on-chain data and key metrics (Daily Volume, Tx Fees, Unique Address, etc. etc.)
- DApps may not use Liq. Incentive for any other purpose.
- DApps must go through KYC procedures to receive incentive payments
Optional Requirements (All)
- How Kaikas can be used to improve usability or create synergies
- Utilizing Klaytnโs account model or transaction model (e.g. fee delegation function)
Appendix : Native Coin Value Accrual Method
The builders participating in this program will be responsible for creating DApps that are part of Project Dragonโs public infrastructure, and the structure they create will be the foundation of Project Dragonโs DeFi ecosystem, so the Foundation will actively utilize its resources to support them. The value they create should trickle down to the network, and the growth of the network will provide the foundation for builders to build on a stronger ecosystem.
Therefore, in the process of collaborating with the Foundation, it is necessary to contribute to the creation of value for the native coin, and all DApps selected for this program must contribute to the creation of value in the form of the following. The items and figures below are examples, and you can propose them according to your DAppโs situation. However, we may give more points to projects with greater contribution in the proposal.
-
Insurance Fund - 10% of revenue
- This is a fund to cover any financial losses that may occur due to exploits or contract malfunctions.
- The revenue generated is periodically converted to the new native coin and stored in the designated wallet address.
- If a native stablecoin is available on Project Dragon, contributions can be made in a combination of the native coin and stablecoin, in a ratio determined by consulting with the Foundation in advance.
-
Revenue Wallet - 10% of revenue
- This refers to the teamโs revenue wallet and must be kept in the new native coin.
- The revenue generated is periodically converted to the new native coin and stored in the designated wallet address.
- If a native stablecoin is available on Project DragonNative Stablecoin is distributed to Klaytn in the future, contributions can be made in a combination the ratio of the native coinKLAY and sStablecoin, in a ratio determined bycan be adjusted by consulting with the Foundation in advance.
-
Burn Fund - 30% of Revenue Wallet resources
- 30% of the funds in the Revenue Wallet will be utilized to burn the new native coin.
- The revenue generated is periodically converted to the new native coin and sent to the burn address.
-
Introducing Weighted Pool LP in the governance structure
- Native coin 30% / Gov. token 70% LP Token should be used to design the governance structure.